AI your law firm can actually use — without waiving privilege
Attorneys paste matter facts into ChatGPT every day. Emil sits between your team and the AI, catching privileged and client-identifying content before it ever leaves the browser.
Associates paste settlement memos and discovery into ChatGPT to summarize — sending privileged material to a third party.
One leak of attorney-client content can waive privilege and trigger a malpractice and ethics exposure.
Firm AI policies are unenforceable: nobody knows which tools are used or what was pasted.
What Emil catches for legal
Client and counterparty names tied to a matter
Case, docket, and matter numbers
Attorney-client privileged language
SSNs, account numbers, and other client PII
Regulations this maps to
ABA Model Rule 1.6 (confidentiality)
State bar AI guidance
GDPR / CCPA for client PII
A content filter reduces regulatory risk but isn't compliance on its own. Review presets with counsel.
Questions
Is it safe for attorneys to use ChatGPT with client files?
Not without a control layer. Pasting client data into ChatGPT transmits it to the provider's servers, which can waive privilege. Emil redacts privileged and client-identifying content before the prompt reaches the model, so attorneys keep the productivity without the disclosure.
Does Emil keep our client data?
No. Emil screens text in memory and stores only metadata — the finding type and severity, never the matched content. There is an audit trail for compliance reviews, but the privileged text itself is never retained.
How do we enforce this across the firm?
Deploy the Emil browser extension to every attorney; it screens prompts on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and others automatically. The shadow-AI dashboard shows which tools are in use and what was caught — turning an unenforceable policy into a measurable control.
Which AI tools does it cover?
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Perplexity and DeepSeek out of the box, plus any OpenAI-compatible API your own tools use.