Education

AI in education that protects students by default

For staff, Emil redacts FERPA-protected student records before prompts reach an AI. For edtech platforms, one API call screens every prompt and response for age-appropriate content.

The problem

  • Teachers paste student work and records into AI tools to draft feedback, exposing FERPA-protected data.
  • An edtech platform's AI can surface age-inappropriate content to minors.
  • Schools and vendors must answer to FERPA and COPPA but lack technical controls.

What Emil catches for education

  • Student names tied to records or grades
  • Education record identifiers
  • Age-inappropriate or unsafe content in AI output
  • PII in prompts and responses

Regulations this maps to

  • FERPA
  • COPPA (under-13)
  • State student-privacy laws

A content filter reduces regulatory risk but isn't compliance on its own. Review presets with counsel.

Questions

How does Emil help with FERPA?
Emil detects and redacts student-record identifiers before a prompt reaches an AI tool, and keeps only metadata — so FERPA-protected data isn't disclosed to an AI vendor.
Can it keep an edtech AI age-appropriate?
Yes. Emil screens AI responses and can block unsafe or age-inappropriate content before it reaches a student — for staff via the browser extension, for platforms via one API call.
Does it work for both teachers and platforms?
Both. Teachers use the no-code browser extension; edtech platforms route their AI through Emil's OpenAI-compatible proxy.
What about students under 13?
Emil includes a COPPA-aware policy preset for products serving children under 13, blocking prohibited data collection and unsafe content.

Other industries