SOC 2 & AI

An AI control your SOC 2 auditor can see

Emil screens what flows into and out of AI tools for sensitive data and records every decision — a demonstrable control and audit trail that supports SOC 2 confidentiality and privacy criteria.

The SOC 2 problem with AI

  • Auditors ask how you control sensitive data in AI tools — and most teams have no answer.
  • Shadow AI usage is an unmonitored path for confidential data to leave.
  • You need evidence the control exists and operates, not just a policy.

How Emil helps with SOC 2

  • Screens prompts and responses for PII, secrets, and confidential content
  • Records every decision as an audit trail for evidence
  • Reports AI tool usage and what was caught across the org
  • Maps to confidentiality and privacy trust-services criteria

What Emil can't do alone

  • It doesn't replace your policies, training, or vendor contracts
  • It can't grant data-subject rights or run risk assessments for you
  • It's one control within a broader compliance program

Emil is a technical control, not a compliance program. It reduces risk and produces evidence, but duties like consent, recordkeeping, risk assessments, and contracts (e.g. BAAs, DPAs) sit outside any screening layer. Review with counsel.

Questions

How does Emil help with SOC 2?
Emil gives you a concrete, evidenced control over sensitive data in AI workflows — screening, an audit trail, and usage reporting — that supports the confidentiality and privacy criteria your auditor evaluates.
Is it itself part of our SOC 2 scope?
Emil is a control you operate; how it fits your scope depends on your system boundary. It provides the evidence (logs, decisions) auditors look for over AI data handling.
Does it store our data?
No. Emil screens in memory and retains only finding metadata, never the content — which is itself helpful for a confidentiality posture.

Other regulations