GDPR & AI

Reduce GDPR exposure when your team uses AI

Every prompt with personal data sent to an AI tool is a processing event. Emil detects and redacts personal and special-category data before it leaves, shrinking what you have to account for.

The GDPR problem with AI

  • Employees paste customer personal data into AI tools — uncontrolled processing and transfer.
  • Special-category data (health, biometrics) in an AI provider's logs is high-risk under GDPR.
  • You can't demonstrate data minimization if everything flows into AI chats unredacted.

How Emil helps with GDPR

  • Detects EU personal data: names, emails, phones, addresses, IDs
  • Redacts before the prompt reaches the AI — data minimization by default
  • Flags special-category indicators for stricter handling
  • Audit trail evidences the control; content itself is never stored

What Emil can't do alone

  • It doesn't replace your policies, training, or vendor contracts
  • It can't grant data-subject rights or run risk assessments for you
  • It's one control within a broader compliance program

Emil is a technical control, not a compliance program. It reduces risk and produces evidence, but duties like consent, recordkeeping, risk assessments, and contracts (e.g. BAAs, DPAs) sit outside any screening layer. Review with counsel.

Questions

Does Emil make us GDPR compliant?
No single tool does. Emil reduces GDPR risk by minimizing the personal data that reaches AI processors and evidencing the control, but rights handling, lawful basis, and DPAs remain your responsibility.
How does it help with data minimization?
Emil redacts personal data before a prompt is sent, so only what's necessary reaches the AI tool — the data-minimization principle applied at the prompt box.
Does Emil store the personal data it sees?
No. It screens in memory and keeps only finding metadata — type and severity — never the personal data itself.

Other regulations